Key takeaways
-
When evaluating a technology-based K–8 math program, ensure it earns its place in the classroom.
-
Six key areas to explore: grade-band coverage; standards alignment and coherence; engagement and usability; differentiation, intervention, and enrichment; assessment, reporting, and progress monitoring; and implementation and progress monitoring.
-
Use our list of what effective K–8 math programs do based on current research to aid your decision-making.
Like other education leaders across the U.S., you may be searching for a K–8 math program that can boost student math achievement. The program could be core curriculum or supplemental resources, but either way, the evaluation process and criteria will be much the same. In this article, we’ll walk through important ways to evaluate a K–8 math program as you try to meet your school or district’s unique needs.
What Districts Should Consider Before Adoption
Is the math program you’re evaluating completely or partially digital? If so, we recommend starting with the idea that every technology earn its place in the classroom. With this in mind, Discovery Education has created a resource specifically for education leaders: Learning by Design: A District Framework for Evaluating Classroom Technology. This framework identifies six dimensions for deciding whether a technology was built to enable learning through distinct, technology-based instructional practices not easily replicated with print materials or offline activities.
Once you’re confident that a digital program is worth investigating further, there are six areas to explore more in depth.
Grade-Band Coverage Across Elementary and Middle School
Does the program support instruction across grades K–8 or is it focused on either K–5 or 6–8? Choosing a K–8 math program may offer benefits such as lower overall cost, easier school- or district-wide implementation and educator training, and reduced mental load for your team when choosing instructional resources. Also a K–8 math program concern: You’ll want to make sure that content is age appropriate and relevant for students in each of the different grade levels to meet their developing capabilities and needs.
Standards Alignment and Instructional Coherence
When a program claims to be aligned to standards, what evidence does it provide? Does it document what standard or standards are covered in each lesson and provide a scope and sequence? Documentation may exist separately from lessons, but especially with edtech, there may be more than one way to see standards covered in each lesson. Of course, a supplemental math program will not cover all of the standards that a core curriculum will, but you should be easily able to see what standards are addressed.
Coherence can refer to how well key instructional system components such as state standards, curricula, and assessments send the same messages and offer supports regarding what instruction should look like. Without coherence, teachers may strictly use state standards as their guide, spend time leaning on their colleagues for support, or simply pull back from the instructional system as much as they can. Therefore, ensure that any K–8 math program you’re considering will match your current messages about what instruction should involve.
Regarding instruction, coherence means that students encounter the same language, routines, and approaches, which end up reinforcing learning.
Student Engagement and Teacher Usability
As our Education Insights 2025–2026 Report showed, 90% of teachers, principals, and superintendents agree that engagement is critical to their students’ success. Despite this, 80% of students say they are bored in school at some point each week. What should you look for in a K–8 math program that will keep students engaged? Getting students to think deeply, using technology intentionally, and providing real-world relevance are excellent indicators that programs will be engaging.
Even though a math program may provide engaging lessons and content, does it make it easy for teachers to assign and deliver those lessons or share content with the class? Related to standards alignment and priorities, does the math program give districts a way to help teachers focus on certain standards based on district goals? It may be easy to discount a program’s usability as a factor in teacher success, but poor usability may slow them down or convince them to avoid the program entirely, wasting funds and possibly reducing instructional quality.
Differentiation, Intervention, and Enrichment
Some form of support for differentiation in Tier 1 instruction is a must-have to reach as many learners as possible with a K–8 math program. This could be ready-to-use resources that are already differentiated, clear guidance on ways to differentiate instruction to meet different needs, or technology that does some or all of the differentiation work for your team. Since manual differentiation is such a time-intensive effort for teachers, a math program that lightens the load significantly should be a top priority.
Ideally, you’re looking at a math program that also enables Tier 2 and Tier 3 intervention for students who need extra support and enrichment opportunities for students who need new challenges. Student benefits from working with a familiar program include a reduced cognitive load and greater instructional coherence, which can boost learning. For schools, this reduces the complexity of teachers’ toolkits, removes the need for supplementation on their own, and may offer cost savings over purchasing separate programs for each student group.
Assessment, Reporting, and Progress Monitoring
Diagnostic, formative, and summative assessments; reporting; and progress monitoring all support data-driven decision-making, which strengthens teaching and learning in many ways. For example:
- Improves the accuracy of placement in different tiers of instruction and boosts learning outcomes of struggling students
- Informs instructional decisions and differentiation aimed at meeting individual student needs
- Provides insight into student, classroom, school, or district performance overall
A K–8 math program that enables assessment, reporting, and progress monitoring offers similar benefits to those mentioned in our discussion of differentiation, intervention, and enrichment. These include a lower cognitive load for students and a less complex set of tools for teachers to master. Adopting a program with robust assessments built in could open up the possibility of dropping separate assessment solutions that you might be using.
Implementation and Professional Learning
Be sure to dive into what implementation would involve at the district, school, and classroom levels, like how the program would fit into your current educator tools and resources and connect to existing systems. If you’re evaluating an edtech program, we identified seven action items for successful implementation that can serve as a guide. Don’t forget to ask a key question of the vendor: Do you provide implementation support to get us up and running with less time and effort?
K–8 math programs will likely include some professional learning, even if it’s limited to getting started, to help your team incorporate it in classroom instruction. Beyond the basics, the vendor should either bundle more extensive professional learning with the program or offer it as a separate package. Options may be virtual or in person, on demand or live, single or multi-session, or combinations of those. Once you see what your choices are, you can match them to your needs and preferences. To be effective, professional learning will have characteristics like a focus on strategies, active learning, collaboration, models of effective practice, and more.
What Makes a K–8 Math Program Effective?
Here’s what current research says effective K–8 math programs do:
- Balance conceptual understanding with procedural fluency
- Build progressively from one concept to another and revisit concepts during the year and across grade levels
- Map all lessons and assessments to specific standards that are identified for educators
- Use visual models, manipulatives, hands-on activities, and structured practice to develop understanding
- Offer Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3 instruction using coherent language, routines, and approaches
- Provide data-driven insights to inform instruction
- Emphasize problem-solving, reasoning, and mathematical practices
- Connect learning to real-world applications
- Integrate differentiation, intervention, and enrichment coherently
- Support teacher implementation through ongoing professional learning
Questions to Ask Before Choosing a K–8 Math Program
Now that we’ve explored various characteristics of K–8 math programs, you might want to put together some questions that can help you decide on a particular program.
For the vendor:
- Do you have case studies or data from schools/districts like ours that have used this program?
- What data would indicate this program is working for our students? How long should we expect it to take?
- What is the total cost of implementation, including materials, professional learning, technology, and ongoing support? Over how many years?
- How is technology used in the program?
- Is there an active learning community associated with the program?
Questions to ask internally:
- Does this program address the specific math achievement challenges we’re facing?
- How does this program align with our district’s strategic goals and priorities for math education?
- What would we need to change to successfully implement this program?
- How will this program work alongside our existing initiatives?
- Do we have teacher buy-in for this program?
Discovery Education’s DreamBox Math
If you’re interested in finding a supplemental K–8 math program to fill gaps in your curriculum, look no further than DreamBox Math. It helps educators foster meaningful learning for every student in a way that no other program can match: Its Intelligent Adaptive Engine responds immediately to every mathematical decision a student makes, ensuring they get differentiated instruction and supports automatically. Through hands-on exploration using virtual manipulatives, students build problem-solving skills they can use in and out of the classroom. Educators get real-time and daily performance data collected via continuous formative assessment, so they always know exactly where each student stands.
How does DreamBox Math measure up against the key characteristics to consider in a math program? Besides the previously mentioned hands-on learning, automatic differentiation, and progress monitoring, here are some of the many ways it matches:
- Supports conceptual understanding and procedural fluency equally
- Builds coherence across grade levels and concepts
- Aligns to 10+ published curricula and every state’s standards
- Backed by ESSA Strong (Tier 1) evidence across 13,000+ students in diverse districts
See what personalized learning in real time for each of your students could look like! Request a demo today.
